|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha : |
05/05/2021 |
Actualizado : |
07/05/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
Autor : |
ORIHUELA, R.; PÉREZ-RUCHEL, A.; MENDOZA, A. |
Afiliación : |
INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay.; Facultad de Veterinaria - UDELAR, Departamento de Nutrición Animal - IPAV, Uruguay.; ALEJANDRO FRANCISCO MENDOZA AGUIAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Efecto de la suplementación individualizada en vacas lecheras en pastoreo.[Effect of individualized supplementation in grazing dairy cows]. |
Complemento del título : |
NA 35. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Congreso Argentino de Producción Animal, 42, Bahía Blanca, Argentina 15-18 octubre 2019. |
Páginas : |
p.61. |
Serie : |
(Revista Argentina de Producción Animal; 2019; 39; Suplemento 1). |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
Conclusiones: Bajo las condiciones de este estudio se concluye que las vacas del tratamiento IND presentaron una producción de
LCS similar a la del tratamiento GRU, pero con menor consumo de concentrado por litro de leche producido. Esto sugeriría una mejor eficiencia en el uso del mismo cuando su asignación se hizo según los requerimientos de cada animal. |
Palabras claves : |
COMPOSICIÓN DE LA LECHE; CONSUMO DE LECHE; PRODUCCIÓN DE LECHE; SISTEMAS LECHEROS. |
Thesagro : |
TAMBO; URUGUAY; VACAS. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15533/1/Revista-Argentina-de-Produccion-Animal-2019.v.39.supl.1.NA-35.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01208nam a2200241 a 4500 001 1062020 005 2021-05-07 008 2019 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aORIHUELA, R. 245 $aEfecto de la suplementación individualizada en vacas lecheras en pastoreo.[Effect of individualized supplementation in grazing dairy cows].$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: Congreso Argentino de Producción Animal, 42, Bahía Blanca, Argentina 15-18 octubre 2019.$c2019 300 $ap.61. 490 $a(Revista Argentina de Producción Animal; 2019; 39; Suplemento 1). 520 $aConclusiones: Bajo las condiciones de este estudio se concluye que las vacas del tratamiento IND presentaron una producción de LCS similar a la del tratamiento GRU, pero con menor consumo de concentrado por litro de leche producido. Esto sugeriría una mejor eficiencia en el uso del mismo cuando su asignación se hizo según los requerimientos de cada animal. 650 $aTAMBO 650 $aURUGUAY 650 $aVACAS 653 $aCOMPOSICIÓN DE LA LECHE 653 $aCONSUMO DE LECHE 653 $aPRODUCCIÓN DE LECHE 653 $aSISTEMAS LECHEROS 700 1 $aPÉREZ-RUCHEL, A. 700 1 $aMENDOZA, A.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
17/10/2014 |
Actualizado : |
15/09/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
CUBBAGE, F.; MAC DONAGH, P.; SAWINSKI, J.; RUBILAR, R.; DONOSO, P.; FERREIRA, A.; HOEFLICH, V.; MORALES OLMOS, V.; FERREIRA, G.; BALMELLI, G.; SIRY, J.; BAEZ, M.N.; ALVAREZ, J. |
Afiliación : |
FREDERICK CUBBAGE, Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, USA; PATRICIO MAC DONAGH, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM), Eldorado, Misiones, Argentina; JOSÉ SAWINSKI, Universidade do Contestado-Canoinhas, Canoinhas, Brazil; RAFAEL RUBILAR, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile; PABLO DONOSO, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile; ARNALDO FERREIRA, Consultant, Forest Genetics, Los Angeles, CA, USA; VITOR HOEFLICH, Embrapa Florestas and Universidade Federal do Paraná (UFPR), Brazil Curitiba, Brazil; VIRGINIA MORALES OLMOS, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; GUSTAVO ALVARO FERREIRA DE MATTOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUSTAVO DANIEL BALMELLI HERNANDEZ, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; JACEK SIRY, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA; MIRTA NOEMI BÁEZ, Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNAM), Eldorado, Misiones, Argentina; JOSÉ ALVAREZ, CMPC Forestry, Concepción, Chile. |
Título : |
Timber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and the Southern United States. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2007 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
New Forests, 2007, v. 33, no. 3, p. 237-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-006-9025-4 |
DOI : |
10.1007/s11056-006-9025-4 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 3 April 2006 / Accepted: 15 October 2006 / Published online: 13 December 2006. |
Contenido : |
Timber investment returns were estimated for the principal exotic and selected native species in the Southern Cone of Latin America and in the Southern United States. Exotic eucalyptus plantations in South America were most profitable, with internal rates of returns (IRRs) ranging from 13% to 23%, followed by exotic loblolly pine, with IRRs from 9% to 17%. Average loblolly pine plantation returns in the US South were less profitable, with an IRR of about 9.5%, and natural forest management in the South had IRRs of 4% to 8%. Subtropical native species plantations of the best araucaria and nothofagus species had reasonable financial returns, with IRRs ranging from 5% to 13%. Subtropical or tropical native forests had fewer commercial timber species, and had much lower growth rates and returns.
Their IRRs were less than 4%, or even negative for unmanaged stands. State subsidy payments for forest plantations or for timber stand improvements increased IRRs
somewhat and reserving areas for environmental protection reduced their IRRs slightly. Including land costs in the cash flows decreased these internal rates of return
substantially. Natural stand returns in Latin America were much less than those of plantations, but management of those stands offered better rates of return than only
holding the land. |
Palabras claves : |
BIOLOGICAL AND FINANCIAL RISK; DESARROLLO TERRITORIAL; FINANCIAL ANALYSES; FOREST PLANTATIONS; LATIN AMERICA; NATIVE FORESTS; SECTOR FORESTAL-MADERERO; URUGUAY. |
Thesagro : |
AMERICA DEL SUR; EUCALYPTUS; FORESTACIÓN; INVERSIONES; MADERA. |
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/3570/1/New-Forests2007v33n3p237-255.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02683naa a2200445 a 4500 001 1051160 005 2020-09-15 008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s11056-006-9025-4$2DOI 100 1 $aCUBBAGE, F. 245 $aTimber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and the Southern United States. 260 $c2007 500 $aArticle history: Received: 3 April 2006 / Accepted: 15 October 2006 / Published online: 13 December 2006. 520 $aTimber investment returns were estimated for the principal exotic and selected native species in the Southern Cone of Latin America and in the Southern United States. Exotic eucalyptus plantations in South America were most profitable, with internal rates of returns (IRRs) ranging from 13% to 23%, followed by exotic loblolly pine, with IRRs from 9% to 17%. Average loblolly pine plantation returns in the US South were less profitable, with an IRR of about 9.5%, and natural forest management in the South had IRRs of 4% to 8%. Subtropical native species plantations of the best araucaria and nothofagus species had reasonable financial returns, with IRRs ranging from 5% to 13%. Subtropical or tropical native forests had fewer commercial timber species, and had much lower growth rates and returns. Their IRRs were less than 4%, or even negative for unmanaged stands. State subsidy payments for forest plantations or for timber stand improvements increased IRRs somewhat and reserving areas for environmental protection reduced their IRRs slightly. Including land costs in the cash flows decreased these internal rates of return substantially. Natural stand returns in Latin America were much less than those of plantations, but management of those stands offered better rates of return than only holding the land. 650 $aAMERICA DEL SUR 650 $aEUCALYPTUS 650 $aFORESTACIÓN 650 $aINVERSIONES 650 $aMADERA 653 $aBIOLOGICAL AND FINANCIAL RISK 653 $aDESARROLLO TERRITORIAL 653 $aFINANCIAL ANALYSES 653 $aFOREST PLANTATIONS 653 $aLATIN AMERICA 653 $aNATIVE FORESTS 653 $aSECTOR FORESTAL-MADERERO 653 $aURUGUAY 700 1 $aMAC DONAGH, P. 700 1 $aSAWINSKI, J. 700 1 $aRUBILAR, R. 700 1 $aDONOSO, P. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, A. 700 1 $aHOEFLICH, V. 700 1 $aMORALES OLMOS, V. 700 1 $aFERREIRA, G. 700 1 $aBALMELLI, G. 700 1 $aSIRY, J. 700 1 $aBAEZ, M.N. 700 1 $aALVAREZ, J. 773 $tNew Forests, 2007$gv. 33, no. 3, p. 237-255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-006-9025-4
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|